Self-Assessment
Continuous Improvement
Rate your practice against each indicator. Use this as a working reference - print it, copy it into a spreadsheet, or work through it on screen.
Version 1.0 - First Edition
Maturity Levels
Not done, or unaware of the requirement
Done inconsistently or informally
Done reliably with evidence
Actively reviewed and improved
Quality Improvement Planning
We have a structured, documented approach to identifying priorities and tracking improvement.
| Ref | Indicator | Not in Place | Developing | Established | Excelling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.1.1 | The practice has a documented quality improvement plan that is reviewed at least annually | ||||
| 8.1.2 | The improvement plan identifies specific goals, responsible persons, and target timeframes | ||||
| 8.1.3 | The improvement plan is informed by the outcomes of the practice's self-assessment against this framework | ||||
| 8.1.4 | Progress against improvement goals is reviewed at defined intervals (at least quarterly) | ||||
| 8.1.5 | Completed improvement actions are documented and the outcomes recorded | ||||
| 8.1.6 | Where an improvement action did not achieve its intended outcome, this is reviewed and a revised approach is documented | ||||
| 8.1.7 | The improvement plan is accessible to relevant staff and is not held solely by a single individual | ||||
| 8.1.8 | Quality improvement goals are prioritised by patient safety impact, not organisational convenience | ||||
| 8.1.9 | The practice revisits its full self-assessment against this framework at least once every two years |
Internal Audit
We regularly review our own processes against defined standards and act on what we find.
| Ref | Indicator | Not in Place | Developing | Established | Excelling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.2.1 | The practice conducts at least two internal audits per year | ||||
| 8.2.2 | Internal audits are planned in advance and cover a mix of clinical and operational topics | ||||
| 8.2.3 | Internal audit findings are documented and shared with relevant staff | ||||
| 8.2.4 | Internal audits result in documented actions where gaps are identified | ||||
| 8.2.5 | Audit topics are selected based on risk, prior incidents, or known areas of variability | ||||
| 8.2.6 | At least one internal audit per year addresses a clinical process or outcome (not solely administrative topics) | ||||
| 8.2.7 | Previous audit findings are reviewed in subsequent cycles to assess whether improvements have been sustained | ||||
| 8.2.8 | The practice has conducted a medication management audit in the past two years (where medications are held or administered) | ||||
| 8.2.9 | The practice has conducted an infection prevention and control audit in the past two years | ||||
| 8.2.10 | The practice has conducted a health records audit in the past two years |
Data Use and Performance Monitoring
We collect, review, and act on data about our practice's performance.
| Ref | Indicator | Not in Place | Developing | Established | Excelling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.3.1 | The practice has identified a small set of key performance indicators (KPIs) relevant to its operations | ||||
| 8.3.2 | KPIs are reviewed at defined intervals by the principal practitioner(s) and practice manager | ||||
| 8.3.3 | Waiting time data (time from referral to appointment) is monitored and reviewed | ||||
| 8.3.4 | Did-not-attend (DNA) and cancellation rates are monitored and reviewed | ||||
| 8.3.5 | Patient feedback data (see Domain 4) is reviewed in the context of quality improvement | ||||
| 8.3.6 | Incident and near-miss data is reviewed in aggregate at least annually to identify patterns | ||||
| 8.3.7 | Complaint data is reviewed in aggregate at least annually to identify patterns | ||||
| 8.3.8 | Where available, clinical outcome data is reviewed by the principal practitioner(s) at least annually | ||||
| 8.3.9 | Data review findings are connected to the improvement plan where action is indicated | ||||
| 8.3.10 | The practice does not rely solely on absence of complaints as evidence of quality |
Learning from Incidents Near Misses and Complaints
We treat things that go wrong as opportunities to improve, not just problems to resolve.
| Ref | Indicator | Not in Place | Developing | Established | Excelling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.4.1 | A documented process exists for reviewing incidents and near misses for learning, separate from the initial response process | ||||
| 8.4.2 | Significant incidents are subject to a structured review (e.g. case discussion, root cause analysis) within a defined timeframe | ||||
| 8.4.3 | Learning identified from incident reviews is translated into documented changes to policy, process, or training | ||||
| 8.4.4 | Changes made in response to incidents are communicated to relevant staff | ||||
| 8.4.5 | Complaints are reviewed for themes and patterns at least annually (see also Domain 1) | ||||
| 8.4.6 | Learning from complaints is connected to the improvement plan where systemic issues are identified | ||||
| 8.4.7 | The practice monitors external safety alerts, recalls, and clinical advisories relevant to its specialty and acts on them promptly | ||||
| 8.4.8 | Near misses are treated with the same learning intent as incidents that caused harm | ||||
| 8.4.9 | Staff feel safe to report incidents and near misses without fear of blame (see also Domain 6) | ||||
| 8.4.10 | The practice can demonstrate at least one documented improvement that originated from an incident or complaint in the past two years |
Peer Review and External Benchmarking
We look outside our own practice to test and calibrate the quality of what we do.
| Ref | Indicator | Not in Place | Developing | Established | Excelling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.5.1 | The principal practitioner(s) participate in at least one form of structured peer review, case discussion, or clinical audit activity annually | ||||
| 8.5.2 | Peer review activity is documented (including the nature of the activity and any learning identified) | ||||
| 8.5.3 | Where the practice's specialty college or professional association offers clinical audit or benchmarking programs, the practice has considered participation | ||||
| 8.5.4 | The practice is aware of relevant national or state-based clinical registries in its specialty and has considered participation where applicable | ||||
| 8.5.5 | Findings from peer review or benchmarking activities are connected to the practice improvement plan where relevant | ||||
| 8.5.6 | Where the practice participates in clinical training (students, registrars, or fellows), feedback from supervisory bodies is reviewed and acted on |
Regulatory Currency and Awareness
We stay current with our legal obligations, relevant standards, and evolving clinical guidance.
| Ref | Indicator | Not in Place | Developing | Established | Excelling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6.1 | A named person in the practice is responsible for monitoring changes to regulation, standards, and guidelines relevant to the practice | ||||
| 8.6.2 | The practice has a defined process for reviewing and acting on updates to relevant legislation (including the Privacy Act, Work Health and Safety Act, and applicable state health legislation) | ||||
| 8.6.3 | The practice monitors updates from AHPRA and relevant specialist college(s) and acts on guidance relevant to its operations | ||||
| 8.6.4 | Clinical policies and procedures are reviewed at defined intervals (at least every two years) and updated to reflect current standards | ||||
| 8.6.5 | The practice has reviewed its obligations under the Australian Privacy Principles in the past two years | ||||
| 8.6.6 | The practice is aware of current mandatory reporting obligations (AHPRA, child protection) and reviews these at staff induction and at least biennially thereafter | ||||
| 8.6.7 | The practice monitors safety alerts and product recalls from the TGA and other relevant bodies | ||||
| 8.6.8 | Relevant changes to regulation or standards are communicated to affected staff promptly | ||||
| 8.6.9 | Policy updates triggered by regulatory change are documented with the reason for the update and the effective date |
Improvement Culture
Our leadership actively creates the conditions for improvement to happen.
| Ref | Indicator | Not in Place | Developing | Established | Excelling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.7.1 | The principal practitioner(s) visibly champion quality improvement within the practice | ||||
| 8.7.2 | Quality improvement is a standing agenda item at practice meetings | ||||
| 8.7.3 | Staff at all levels are encouraged to identify improvement opportunities and their suggestions are taken seriously | ||||
| 8.7.4 | Staff who identify problems or raise concerns are thanked, not managed | ||||
| 8.7.5 | The practice celebrates and communicates improvements that have been achieved | ||||
| 8.7.6 | Time and resource are allocated (however modestly) to quality improvement activity - it is not expected to happen in staff members' personal time | ||||
| 8.7.7 | New staff are introduced to the practice's quality framework and improvement approach during induction | ||||
| 8.7.8 | The practice manager has access to professional development relevant to healthcare quality and governance | ||||
| 8.7.9 | The practice does not treat this framework as a compliance exercise - it can articulate at least two specific improvements made as a result of using it |
Not sure what counts as evidence?
The evidence guide provides concrete examples for every indicator in this domain.